Mungamuru, Bob and Weis, Stephen and Garcia-Molina, Hector (2008) Should Ad Networks Bother Fighting Click Fraud? (Yes, They Should.). Technical Report. Stanford.
BibTeX | DublinCore | EndNote | HTML |
| PDF 317Kb |
Abstract
Suppose an ad network decides that a given click-through is invalid (or ``fraudulent''). The implication is that the ad network will not bill the advertiser for that click-through. On the other hand, if the ad network decides that the click-through was valid, they could charge full price. Therefore, arguably, the ad network is ``leaving money on the table'' by marking click-throughs invalid. As such, should ad networks even bother fighting click fraud? We analyze a simple economic model of the online advertising market and conclude that the answer is, unequivocally, ``yes''.
Item Type: | Techreport (Technical Report) | |
---|---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | click fraud, economics, publishers, advertising networks, advertisers | |
Subjects: | Computer Science > E-Commerce | |
Projects: | PORTIA (DB-Privacy) | |
Related URLs: | Project Homepage | http://crypto.stanford.edu/portia/ |
ID Code: | 840 | |
Deposited By: | Import Account | |
Deposited On: | 01 Jul 2008 17:00 | |
Last Modified: | 10 Dec 2008 16:05 |
Download statistics
Repository Staff Only: item control page